The Argument from Time
·
Premise 1: We can speak meaningfully of events
past, present, and future.
·
Premise 2: Meaningful propositions can be either
true or false.
·
Premise 3: True propositions are true insofar as
they reflect reality. False propositions are false insofar as they fail to
reflect reality.
·
Premise 4: Though from the Classical Theist
perspective, this statement would be grammatically problematic, for the
atheist:
- Reality exists.
- Reality exists.
·
Premise 5: The proposition "X happened in
the past" can be meaningful insofar as it can:
a) Reflect reality, or
b) Fail to reflect reality
- If (a), the past event X must in some sense, therefore, exist
because reality exists (P4)
a) Reflect reality, or
b) Fail to reflect reality
- If (a), the past event X must in some sense, therefore, exist
because reality exists (P4)
·
Premise 6: In order for Proposition "X
happened in the past" to reflect reality, there must be some sense in
which that which the proposition reflects exists, that it might reflect
existent reality (P4).
·
Premise 7: Nothing temporal (that is, subject to
or contingent upon a mode of temporality) can account for the veracity of
proposition "X happened in the past" because temporally contingent
realities by their nature are "governed" (existentially) by that
which requires accountability, that is, the existent past, present, and future.
·
Premise 8: Only a reality whose nature is
eternal can account for the existence of past (and future) such that
propositions relating to which can be meaningful.
·
Premise 9: Eternality, therefore, cannot be
affected by temporality but must sustain the three dynamics of temporality in
existence.
Conclusion: Therefore, there must exist eternal reality amongst temporal realities that sustain temporal existence, yet is unaffected by temporal reality, and this is what we call God.
No comments:
Post a Comment